Prisoners and their protection in red cross committees <br />DR. Asaad Ghali<br /><br />War is a negative situation in international relations and is prohibited in accordance with the rules of international humanitarian law and cannot be used as a means of resolving international armed conflicts and emphasizing the need to resolve conflicts through diplomatic means, despite the UN's assertion that conflicts must be resolved peacefully, war, despite its illegality, is wreaking havoc around the globe. If they occur, they necessarily have some effects, which are considered to be the application of international humanitarian law and its principles in the foreground, and these rules are applied from the outbreak of the war until the end of the armed conflict in general and prisoners of war are finally released or returned to their homelands, and prisoners of war are added to persons of the armed forces in the hands of the other party, hence the application of the rules on the protection of prisoners of war stipulated in the third agreement of the Convention on the Protection of Prisoners of War. Geneva in 1949, stipulated the need to respect the humanity of the fighter, albeit captive in terms of food, shelter, clothing, and the right to practice religious rituals and rituals. <br />But working life is a flagrant violation of the convention, with prisoners being treated in a way that is equally cowardly and humane.<br />The captive agreement does not abide by the misrepresentation of basic information (full name, army number, military rank, date of birth), but the barrier state now does not care about these articles and provisions, torturing prisoners physically and psychologically for the purpose of retaliating against them in exchange for their duty while participating with their country's forces or for racial, national or religious reasons, or for the purpose of using them as information against their country, which violates the principles of international humanitarian law.<br /><br />