There have been many recent infringement and violations in the field of scientific research (which so-called plagiarism) represented in lack of integrity and honesty in shifting and the attribution of ideas to their owners. The main reason for the spread of the this phenomenon is the huge amount of information available everywhere and on the Internet in particular, which made scientific theft available and justified for many. Thus, the great technological progress in modern means of communication and computerization of programs and information helped in that access to various information easily—with weak moral among some researchers (Stepchyshyn, Nelson 2007: 1-2). This calls for activating the value and moral system to protect them from deviation in behavior and encroachment on the efforts of others in their scientific production, and to establish a principle of the aggressor. It is considered to be copying the thoughts and words of another person, and claiming ownership of the acquirer (Stepchyshyn, Nelson 2007: 1-2). Such a process is seen as a form of looting, fraud, and forgery, and is also classified as a felony. Actually, it is said that ‘plagiarism’ is considered in many countries as a ‘crime’ punishable by law in most countries (Creutz 2010). Accordingly, as mentioned by Creutz (2010) through About Plagiarism.org, in most cases, scientific theft (plagiarism in particular) is a misdemeanor, and the retribution is a large fine—sometimes it ends with a one-year prison sentence. At other times, this is a crime in some US states and within some federal laws. For example, if the thief of the scientific article won more than $ 2,500 from a copyrighted material, the financial fine may reach $ 250,000, and the prison term may be up to ten years. <br />It is categorized as: 1) using the writing and works of another person, and claiming ownership of it. 2) Quote quotes in research without mentioning the source. 3) Use quotes from books as if they were part of the text. 4) Change some of the words from the text, and publish them as the words of the person who made the move, and this usually happens without the consent of the owner of the text. <br />Whereas, scholars at many areas resort to 'plagiarism’, it might because many students are discouraged, and their writing ways criticized, if they use their own words and phrases. Consequently, many acknowledge their failure and resort to pick up other words and phrases of those who have already been proven competence and their written and creative skills. Many foreign researchers resort to this to ensure higher scores and better results. In addition to scientific thefts, the phenomenon of inventing and fabricating the results is spreading in a way that supports proving scientific theory or confirming the discovery of a new phenomenon or a new drug or fruitful industrial or agricultural method and method, and it is of two types: fabrication and fabrication of results and falsification of research material and manipulation, which is one of the phenomena prevalent in the world for Example: according to Wikipedia Scientific Misconduct: the statistics released by “US Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Research Integrity” confirm that 3% of research institutions report there is a form of scientific misconduct, which includes fabrication and falsification of results, unlawful quotation, false claim, intentional negligence, and violation of ethical standards in human and animal experiments. Responsibility for any form of scientific abuse lies first with the researcher, his research participants, and then the Institute for Scientific Research or the university and the publisher and the scientific journal that published the research. The responsibility also falls on the research colleagues who are not involved in the research and reviewers or reviewers of the search results if they prefer to remain silent About this breach of sound scientific methods. <br />One of the most famous examples of falsifying the results is the work of Woo-Suk Hwang of the University of Seoul, Korea, on stem cells, which was published in the most prestigious international scientific journals and earned the researcher great fame as he claimed the production of stem cells by cloning. Dozens of other examples have been discovered and announced in the world, many of which claim that most of the research that claims the discovery of a new type of medical drug or vaccine contains some degree of manipulation. However, to this day, we have not heard in the Arab countries that one scientific theft has been revealed by an investigation committee and announced through the media, knowing that I do not mean these robberies merely to change some data or quotation and short partial paraphrasing, but to claim ownership of a complete research published in English or after translating it into Arabic, or a thesis based on fully quoted results. Is this due to the absence of such robberies among native speakers of Arabic, or to the fact that we fear scandals and cover them, or the misery of our social reality that is not concerned with scientific intellectual production and the weakness of our scientific levels that are not able to find compelling evidence of such thefts, or because these thefts are the global scientific product and not of our Arab product, so the right of ownership lies with its carrier.<br />To conclude this article, some instructions should be included related to scientific behavior and research ethics should be issued that include the concept of scientific and intellectual theft, misuse of scientific information, terms of authorship and reference to published information and quotes. The instructions should include specific and deterrent penalties against violators. The purpose of these instructions is to provide explanations in this regard to deter unlawful citation, and in a positive manner in order to maintain integrity in scientific research and ethical commitment in practices because such instructions constitute a deterrent to the phenomena of flattening scientific research and lead to increased attention to detail and accurate data, including pushing the researcher to Providing qualitative and quantitative evidence using statistical techniques and increasing the credibility of certificates and the results of scientific research among the public. These instructions and directives will help maintain the highest ethical standards in the field of scientific research and prevent unethical practices from fabricating, falsifying or plagiarizing. These instructions will also help to add a good image to the university because it shows its seriousness and commitment in not accepting any kind of non-scientific behavior in research or publication. These instructions should give a clear picture of the scientific theft and what punishment may be exposed to it by the researcher. The researcher should know that the legitimate quotation must not exceed a few words or short phrases, and when the quotation exceeds more than this, the text should be enclosed in brackets and referred to the original source. It is important for the instructions to emphasize the necessity of not publishing in pseudo magazines, which usually encourages publishing without peer review and without ensuring that the researcher adheres to the ethics of scientific research and scientific behavior in exchange for high fees for publication.<br /><br />References<br />About Plagiarism.org. https://www.plagiarism.org <br />Creutz R. (2010). Plagiarism Punishment. http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-detection-blog/bid/52974/Plagiarism-Punishment#.XtuVptpR3IU <br />Stepchyshyn V., Nelson R. S., (2007). Library Plagiarism Policies. Association of College & Research Libraries. https://books.google.iq/books?id=OHamIn5dPR8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false <br />Wikipedia Scientific Misconduct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct <br />