In the world of engineering technology and art, the struggle of forms is one of the most prominent phenomena reflecting the dynamic nature of this evolving field. Geometric shapes are not just superficial designs; they are the essence of technical solutions that determine the quality and efficiency of products and artistic structures. This struggle is manifested in the competition between different geometric forms, each aiming to achieve multiple goals such as durability, efficiency, aesthetics, cost, and environmental sustainability.
The struggle usually begins between traditional geometric shapes that have been used for decades, such as squares, rectangles, and circles, and modern geometric shapes that have emerged with technological advancements, like curved, composite, and complex three-dimensional shapes. Traditional forms offer ease of manufacturing, design, and great durability, while modern shapes exploit new material properties and advanced manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing, enabling the design of products with unique functional and aesthetic characteristics.
One of the main aspects of this struggle is achieving a balance between form and function. Engineering art is not only about making products look good but ensuring they perform their tasks efficiently. For example, in the design of cars and airplanes, shapes play a crucial role in reducing air resistance, which contributes to lowering fuel consumption and harmful emissions, positively impacting the environment. Here, the conflict arises between designs focusing solely on aesthetics and those focusing on efficiency and effectiveness.
Furthermore, advances in modern technologies like artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and smart materials have added a new dimension to this struggle, allowing the design of intelligent geometric forms that adapt to environmental conditions or perform tasks more effectively. This development opens broad horizons for innovation but also increases the complexity of choosing the optimal form for each case.
The struggle between geometric forms in engineering technology is not limited to design but extends to manufacturing processes and economic cost. Some complex shapes may be more efficient but require advanced and expensive manufacturing techniques, posing a challenge for engineers to balance quality and cost.
From an environmental perspective, the choice of geometric forms plays an important role in achieving sustainability. Smart engineering design can reduce material and energy consumption, increase product lifespan, and reduce waste generated from production and consumption. This makes the struggle between artistic forms a struggle for a more sustainable and environmentally conscious future.
Conclusion
The struggle of forms in engineering technology and art reflects a larger struggle between innovation, efficiency, and sustainability. This struggle drives engineers and designers to develop new solutions that align with contemporary requirements, respect the environment, and better meet human needs.
In support of this approach, this article is part of the Sustainable Development Goals, specifically Goal 4: Quality Education. Education is the key to understanding these challenges and opportunities, empowering future generations of engineers and technicians to develop innovative and sustainable solutions that contribute to building a better future for all.
Almustaqbal University, The First University in Iraq